This blog has been accused of trivia, even froth. The phrase 'shallow as a puddle' has been used. We refute this. Utterly. And to prove our point, we are offering a serious subject for this weekend's debate.
Should national borders be abolished? Please give reasons for your answer.
Shallow as a puddle, indeed. Bah.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
(Reopened: see 12/08/08) Play fair and share share share.
Post Box Stuffers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(129)
-
▼
June
(20)
- Tell: Sticky
- Debate: Pseudonym
- Right Now: Custard Pie
- Experience: Encore
- Picture Response #19
- Tell: Geo-wow
- Debate: Holiday
- Right Now: Sentenced
- Experience: Birthday
- Tell: Talk To The Animals
- Debate: Roses
- Right Now: Quality Of Life
- Experience: Exposed
- Picture Response #18
- Tell: Teacher
- Debate: Borders
- Right Now: Interviewee
- Experience: 2007
- Picture Response #17
- Tell: Carrots
-
▼
June
(20)
BlogCatalog
Blogflux
Blogarama
1 comment:
As a really crude general rule, I assume that as organisations get bigger, they get less (socially) efficient, less friendly. Nations without borders - an interesting concept - would call for some kind of mega/meta/macro organisation/s for enforcing the law (assuming there are laws to enforce) (see how ideologically constrained my thinking has become). I would have no faith in such an organisation/s to work (communicate) effectively across the globe. Thus, no. Keep borders.
Post a Comment